Editor’s note: This column is available exclusively through King Features Syndicate. For permission to reprint or excerpt this copyrighted material, please contact: kfsreprint@hearstsc.com, or phone 800-708-7311, ext 246).
Would someone be fit to be attorney general of the United States if he had once said, “I think there are probably very few people in this room or in America who would say that torture should never, ever be used, particularly if thousands of lives are stake”?
By the standard Democrats are using to oppose the nomination of Judge Michael Mukasey as attorney general, the answer would be “no.” In fact, whoever endorsed torture so explicitly would be relegated to the moral outer darkness. Lucky for him, Sen. Chuck Schumer, who made the above comment during a June 2004 Senate hearing on terrorism, is a member in good standing of the Senate Democratic leadership.
Mukasey is not so fortunately situated. He’s only a respected federal judge whose hallmark is a painstaking commitment to the law. He would never, as Schumer did, endorse violations of U.S. law, the Constitution and Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. Mukasey has been absolutely clear that torture is illegal and wrong.
But he won’t say that the interrogation technique of waterboarding — which simulates drowning and induces instant, resistance-breaking panic in detainees — constitutes torture. On this basis, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, fulminated against Mukasey, “Will we join that gloomy historical line leading from the Inquisition, through the prisons of tyrant regimes, through gulags and dark cells, and through Saddam’s torture chambers?”
CONTINUED 1 2 Next >
